<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco UCS and Nexus 5000 DataCenter – Our Implementation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/</link>
	<description>and linux between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Goodman</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Goodman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EMC CX4 comes with 2 controllers (Service Processors) per array.  So you have an SPA and SPB.  They are redundant to each other.  We also use EMC RecoverPoint replication to replicate the critical LUNs on the CX4 to an off-site location. We have another EMC and vmware cluster at a second datacenter.  We can bring up backups or boot systems that were replicated through RecoverPoint at that site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EMC CX4 comes with 2 controllers (Service Processors) per array.  So you have an SPA and SPB.  They are redundant to each other.  We also use EMC RecoverPoint replication to replicate the critical LUNs on the CX4 to an off-site location. We have another EMC and vmware cluster at a second datacenter.  We can bring up backups or boot systems that were replicated through RecoverPoint at that site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pual</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pual]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i would like to copycat configuration design above.
it&#039;s necessary or not to have SAN clustering?
my idea do same thing at two location for HA. 
provide me opinion please..in case EMC CX4 broken down
----
thank you for your information very helpful for newbie like me..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to copycat configuration design above.<br />
it&#8217;s necessary or not to have SAN clustering?<br />
my idea do same thing at two location for HA.<br />
provide me opinion please..in case EMC CX4 broken down<br />
&#8212;-<br />
thank you for your information very helpful for newbie like me..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Goodman</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Goodman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCoE Performance has been fine.  I was worried initially because we were doing dedicated dual 4gb fibre uplinks to our physical servers.  The C2148 are for legacy gigabit (1gig) ethernet.  They are uplinked to the nexus 5010s by dual 10gbE ports (so they have 20gigabit throughput to the 5010 network).  Each 2148 can have up to 4 - 10gbE uplinks to the 5010s.  They are controlled / admin&#039;ed through the 5010s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCoE Performance has been fine.  I was worried initially because we were doing dedicated dual 4gb fibre uplinks to our physical servers.  The C2148 are for legacy gigabit (1gig) ethernet.  They are uplinked to the nexus 5010s by dual 10gbE ports (so they have 20gigabit throughput to the 5010 network).  Each 2148 can have up to 4 &#8211; 10gbE uplinks to the 5010s.  They are controlled / admin&#8217;ed through the 5010s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pual</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pual]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cool.... SAN over FCOE
how good performance?
i wounder a lot off switch (8) what C2148 use for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool&#8230;. SAN over FCOE<br />
how good performance?<br />
i wounder a lot off switch (8) what C2148 use for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Cisco UCS and Nexus 5000 DataCenter – Our Implementation « Colocation to Virtualization -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Cisco UCS and Nexus 5000 DataCenter – Our Implementation « Colocation to Virtualization -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Gracely. Brian Gracely said: RT @colovirt #Cisco UCS and Nexus 5000 #DataCenter - Our Implementation: http://wp.me/pm3nc-et [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Gracely. Brian Gracely said: RT @colovirt #Cisco UCS and Nexus 5000 #DataCenter &#8211; Our Implementation: <a href="http://wp.me/pm3nc-et" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pm3nc-et</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamonation</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamonation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, r.e. last comment, I didn&#039;t see the notes on your post ;)

I&#039;m working on a full 10GbE SFP+ and 10Base-T deployment using Arista 7100T switches for storage and LAN, and Cisco 4900M 10GbE SFP+ uplinks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, r.e. last comment, I didn&#8217;t see the notes on your post ;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on a full 10GbE SFP+ and 10Base-T deployment using Arista 7100T switches for storage and LAN, and Cisco 4900M 10GbE SFP+ uplinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamonation</title>
		<link>http://blog.colovirt.com/2010/07/07/cisco-ucs-and-nexus-5000-datacenter-our-implementation/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamonation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colovirt.com/?p=897#comment-563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting setup, are you using multipath over the 10GB and 4GB links or just over the dual 4GB links for storage?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting setup, are you using multipath over the 10GB and 4GB links or just over the dual 4GB links for storage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

